Senators Block Permanent Daylight Saving Bill, Citing Winter Sunrises
Republican leaders in the Senate are likely to let a House-passed bill expire without a vote, despite intense pressure from President Trump to end the twice-yearly clock change.
By Javier Cabrera ·

The U.S. Senate is set to leave a House-passed bill on the table this year, effectively rejecting the push to make daylight saving time permanent and defying a direct appeal from the White House.
The legislation, which would eliminate the bi-annual time change, faces strong resistance from senators in northern states who fear the policy would result in late winter sunrises. The Senate is not expected to schedule a vote before the November 3 midterm elections, leaving the bill to expire in the short session that follows.
The dispute began in earnest when President Trump publicly demanded Senate Republicans pass the measure. Earlier this month, the president posted his personal cellphone number on social media and directed Senator Tom Cotton to act, writing, "GET IT DONE!" Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas and a member of GOP leadership, has become the primary voice against the change. He argued that while few enjoy changing clocks, Congress has tried this before and reversed course after citizens complained about the darkness in the morning.
Other Republican senators, particularly those representing states with later sunrises, have joined Cotton in opposition. Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota stated that the change would mean sending children to school in the dark. Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio was more direct when asked about the bill's prospects this month, responding, "No way." Senator Todd Young of Indiana noted that Senate Republican leaders view the House bill as a non-starter.
Trump has renewed his push this week on Truth Social, claiming the Senate is letting the bill die against the will of a majority of the country. The president has framed the issue around his personal interest in golf, arguing that more afternoon daylight allows for more time on the course. He also contended that the current system is dangerous for workers maintaining steeples on churches and municipal buildings. He dismissed the practice of adjusting clocks as a waste of time, noting that digital devices now handle the switch automatically.
The legislative history of this issue is brief but instructive. In 1973, Congress passed a law making daylight saving time permanent during an energy crisis. The policy was repealed by October of that year as public support collapsed, driven largely by concerns over children walking to school in the dark. Today, fewer Americans remember that experiment, even as polls show a deep dissatisfaction with the current system.
An AP-NORC poll conducted last year found that only 12 percent of American adults supported the current twice-yearly change, while nearly half opposed it. Professional groups including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine have backed the move to a single time standard. Senator Rick Scott of Florida, who signed a state-level bill in 2018 allowing Florida to keep daylight saving time if approved federally, has led recent efforts to make the change national. He cited constant feedback from citizens who find the practice an unnecessary annoyance.
Several Democrats have also supported the measure. Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts argued in favor of Scott's bill last year, stating that the ritual of shifting time impacts the economy and health. He urged the Senate to say goodbye to 4 p.m. winter sunsets. Senator John Thune, the Republican Majority Leader, has not publicly weighed in on the specific House bill, though he has voted against similar versions in the past.
Source: The Boston Globe





